EVO: Ferrari 599 GTO vs Lexus LFA


Soup

Premium
Ferrari 599 GTO v Lexus LFA video
New Ferrari 599 GTO v Lexus LFA video review and picture gallery | evo

49da3bca7c943c7938d377fb28a676a0.webp


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Ferrari 599 GTO or Lexus LFA, V12 v V10: which screaming hypercar would you have? Let this video battle help you decide...

It's the battle of 2011's ultimate hypercars. The high-revving, sonorously-soundtracked V10 Lexus LFA and V12 Ferrari 599 GTO battle it out in the epic Scottish Highlands and on track. Which do you think sounds the best? Full story in evo issue 161, on sale Weds September 17.

7186d879043881da862525a2f5a8b556.webp

ea45fa7fdd3fffd29b1c2dafe3ab2f84.webp

6e09dd0cb4678ebc878e430608962cc4.webp

02db70e3034e790858a5298ce5cf1b6a.webp

04a948df67428624b5312167efe70d10.webp

b415c9ccfa974fd4c8935741317f6461.webp

e4bcadbcd472f8cbe39f40343ef61c23.webp

e91571c92da6fc26ad62dcd1b9de150e.webp

67afd47739c7137443f77396c10e7f42.webp

0b18eed1c70d7628c79b7872dbb92ee3.webp


64ac784c0be931e223d6f8b9d9cac30b.webp
 
Wow! Two of my most favorite cars. Looking forward to reading it. It will be very interesting.

That surface looks bumpy and the tach needle is trembling quite badly. The extremely lightweight LFA flywheel seemed to be struggling to keep the jolts from killing forward momentum.

Nevertheless, Lexus should feel honored for even having their first supercar ever to be compared to the halo Ferrari 599 GTO.
 
Does Evo always conduct its test with a passenger in the passenger seat?? Both times are 0.5 seconds off their official times.
 
GTO. The LFA might be a great car, but it is a few notches below the Ferrari.

^Yup, same, but the really cruel thing is if you can afford one, you can afford both. sigh!

If I'm not mistaken, one can buy neither :D

Nevertheless, Lexus should feel honored for even having their first supercar ever to be compared to the halo Ferrari 599 GTO.

Certainly not the first for Toyota.
 
I'm with you guys, I really don't know which one I'd go with. They both scream sinister brutality to me. Emphasis on "scream"
 
GTO. The LFA might be a great car, but it is a few notches below the Ferrari.

We will find out when we read it. I wish Chris Harris was also in the loop. I certainly feel the much more hardcore Nurburgring edition LFA is a good match in terms of track abilities.

I am sure if Lexus had made the Nurburgring prototype available to EVO, they would have pit the Nurburgring edition instead, but Lexus is keeping it under the covers while going through final testing till the end of the year when it will go into production.

Certainly not the first for Toyota.

My mistake. 2000 GT being the first one.
 
Does Evo always conduct its test with a passenger in the passenger seat?? Both times are 0.5 seconds off their official times.
Yes, they do. Here's their comment about R&T's Veyron test:
"Their run at the Lemoore naval base in California was without a passenger, but we’ve always recorded our times two-up..."
9ff GT9 | Features | evo

In Autocar's Z06 vs GT2 test at Bruntingthorpe, Chris Harris mentions that the first part of the runway has an uphill incline. Surface isn't great either, so front-engined cars with traction issues are hampered here. Some LC systems will require a few runs for the system to "learn" the surface but in any case the GTO is faster as expected.


I'd have a tough time choosing between the two. The 599 with even the normal V12 is already epic and the GTO must surely be borderline insane by comparison. Without an electric steering setup like the LFA's, it will probably feel more organic. I might give it to the Lexus for its interior styling and the overall sense that it's a much more bespoke and special car.
 
So what is to blame for the relatively underwhelming times?? I guess from your post, it seems the surface condition of the runway is to reason. Maybe, they will elaborate on it in the magazine.

Yes, they do. Here's their comment about R&T's Veyron test:
"Their run at the Lemoore naval base in California was without a passenger, but we’ve always recorded our times two-up..."
9ff GT9 | Features | evo

In Autocar's Z06 vs GT2 test at Bruntingthorpe, Chris Harris mentions that the first part of the runway has an uphill incline. Surface isn't great either, so front-engined cars with traction issues are hampered here. Some LC systems will require a few runs for the system to "learn" the surface but in any case the GTO is faster as expected.


I'd have a tough time choosing between the two. The 599 with even the normal V12 is already epic and the GTO must surely be borderline insane by comparison. Without an electric steering setup like the LFA's, it will probably feel more organic. I might give it to the Lexus for its interior styling and the overall sense that it's a much more bespoke and special car.
 
So what is to blame for the relatively underwhelming times?? I guess from your post, it seems the surface condition of the runway is to reason. Maybe, they will elaborate on it in the magazine.
It's probably a combination of all that I mentioned: surface condition, weight of the passenger, and perhaps the uphill incline. On this same runway, Autocar's Veyron Super Sport recorded 0-30 in 1.4. This is up from the 1.1-1.2s seen in US mag tests of the regular Veyron, so we'd expect the SS should be faster than that. The US mags and Autocar run 2-way averages in an effort to cancel the effects of wind. From what I've read from people who run in the VMAX events at Bruntingthorpe, calm windless days are exceedingly rare. It's possible Evo ran in one direction only.

I'm pretty confident that they use the same BBS wheels.
49da3bca7c943c7938d377fb28a676a0.webp
They are different in design. LFA's front wheel is also 0.5 inch narrower.
d025915f662e07575d47e5e9662d4014.webp

ce27f743d0386d3b5c1adc4046265c45.webp
 
Yes, that makes sense. I remember a while back reading a first test in a magazine and they ripped a 0-60 mph in the 599 GTO with launch control in only 3.0 seconds or thereabouts. That is a whopping 0.8 seconds quicker than this test.

Will they test the cars on Bedford???

It's probably a combination of all that I mentioned: surface condition, weight of the passenger, and perhaps the uphill incline. On this same runway, Autocar's Veyron Super Sport recorded 0-30 in 1.4. This is up from the 1.1-1.2s seen in US mag tests of the regular Veyron, so we'd expect the SS should be faster than that. The US mags and Autocar run 2-way averages in an effort to cancel the effects of wind. From what I've read from people who run in the VMAX events at Bruntingthorpe, calm windless days are exceedingly rare. It's possible Evo ran in one direction only.
 
That LFA sure sounds like a fantastic piece of engineering, and it really showcases what Toyota are capable of when they want to compete with the big boys. ....but, that 599 is the first Ferrari since the F40 that has really captured my attention and passion. Add to that the fact that this is the GTO version and the Lexus unfortunately would be my second choice here.
 
Previously, LFA had a comparo with the 599 GTB with the HGTE track package:


eb0ad1dbf7c36ad70ee1e4480dbacbdf.webp


58a7a2f1be8190c2d5d513e5ce66475d.webp



7a77e62901b9d9470bdb39e6891d3103.webp


d5c1f8d678fdf9c7385e2bee5c2a8545.webp





Summary:

The Lexus feels more athletic than the Ferrari, and its performance is more accessible, more immediately. The engine is remarkable. Austin noted: “They  figured out the engine. It’s really strong, and then you hit about 6500 rpm and your eyes get all big as the power hits another level.” The only street-car engine that matches this one for smoothness, ecstatic noise, and power delivery is the 458 Italia’s.

One of the LFA’s coolest features is the central tach that moves across the instrument binnacle. The color changes to white and the increments become bigger when the driver selects “sport.”

The steering is direct, accurate, and connected, and the whole chassis is balanced and entertaining. The LFA looks like a GT car on paper but acts more like a sports car—much like those great Ferrari two-seaters of  yore. The brakes are easily modulated and powerful, but the LFA gets tossed around by road-camber changes, and it tramlines more than the Ferrari.

Away from the twisting roads of Wales, the LFA lost a few points. It rides firmly on the highway, even though it’s never uncomfortable. The engine note is intrusive while cruising at 80 mph or more. And the transmission feels like it’s a decade or so behind the times. Used manually, it’s instantaneous, superbly fast and heroic. But around town in automatic mode, you can almost hear the gears mesh and the selector forks moving them into place. In essence, it feels like the Ferrari gearbox from the 360 Modena of two generations ago

These minor quibbles aside, the LFA is an amazing car—and an amazing achievement. Out of the box, Toyota’s first supercar beats a Ferrari. Yeah, you read that correctly. If Toyota put the same soul and *passion into the rest of its cars, the company would be unbeatable.
 
Of course the HGTE isn't a GTO. Also, the HGTE hasn't met with universal praise with most publications preferring the regular 599. The GTO on the other hand is closer to the 599XX.
I've always maintained that the Lexus is an unquestionably special car - one that I'd like to drive more than many, many established exotica - but in the presence of a GTO... well, quite frankly, Ferrari trumps Lexus.
 

Thread statistics

Created
Soup,
Last reply from
330CIZHP,
Replies
76
Views
12,775

Trending content


Back
Top