Smart-Bugatti top loss-making cars


dalab

Banned
Silver Arrow Expert
Messages
12,235
Name
Daniel
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/i...bugatti-veyron-head-list-top-loss-making-cars

Analysts compile a list of the top loss-making cars of recent times, with the Smart Fortwo being responsible for losing Mercedes billions of pounds.

Mercedes’ tiny Smart Fortwo city car project made the biggest losses of modern times, according to figures from the automotive analysts at BersteinResearch.
The analysts say that although ‘catastrophic losses are rare’ in the auto industry, they have complied a list of which they think uncovers the biggest product failures of recent times.
Perhaps the two themes running through these results are, firstly, the risks associated with making big technological leaps (and the accompanying big investments) and, secondly, the risks associated with rolling out a vehicle that seriously fails to convince buyers in its market niche.
The Smart project is a good example of the former. Mercedes took over a project developed by Swatch founder Nicholas Hayeck and turned it into a technological tour de force. Smart got a brand new platform, brand new three-cylinder engines and a new factory at Hambach, near the French-German border.
Berstein’s analysts estimate that Mercedes sank nearly £3 billion into building Smart from scratch, a huge risk on a car at the cheaper end of the market. In the event, it also undershot its sales targets by over 40 per cent.
The Fiat Stilo, Renault Laguna, Peugeot 1007 and Jaguar X-type are, they say, examples of cars that simply missed their intended markets and massively undershot sales estimates, by an average 70 per cent in the case of the Fiat, 88 per cent in the case of the 1007 and 74 per cent in the case of the Jaguar.
The Bugatti Veyron and VW Phaeton may be in the top ten, too, but the analysts point out that while the VW management knew that the Veyron would lose money, the car was a technical showcase for the VW Group. The Phaeton is, of course, personally backed by VW’s powerful chairman, Ferdinand Piech, arguably putting it outside normal financial considerations.
See below for the full results.

Overall losses

1997-2006: Smart Fortwo – £2.82bn
2001-2009: Fiat Stilo – £1.77bn
2001- : Volkswagen Phaeton – £1.68bn
2004-2009: Peugeot 1007 – £1.59bn
1997-2004: Mercedes A-class – £1.44bn
2005-2013: Bugatti Veyron – £1.43bn
2001 – 2009: Jaguar X-type – £1.43bn
2006 – 2012: Renault Laguna – £1.30bn
2000 – 2005: Audi A2 – £1.2bn
2001-2009: Renault Vel Satis – £1bn

Losses per unit

2005-2013: Bugatti Veyron – £3,887,051 per unit
2001- : Volkswagen Phaeton – £23,655 per unit
2001-2009: Renault Vel Satis – £15,751 per unit.
2004-2009: Peugeot 1007 – £12,947 per unit
2000 – 2005: Audi A2 – £6340 per unit
2001 – 2009: Jaguar X-type – £3945 per unit
1997-2006: Smart Fortwo – £3762 per unit
2006 – 2012: Renault Laguna – £2986 per unit
2001-2009: Fiat Stilo - £2297 per unit
1997-2004: Mercedes A-class - £1214 per unit
 
I didn't expect to see the Laguna there. It was not such a bad car and I believed it sold acceptably.

The Peugeot 1007, on the other hand, while brilliant, it costed TOO much for what it was - a small city car. Same for the Smart.
 
Why Daimler is treating SMART as the step child is a puzzle. There is not a single product worthwhile in the SMART portfolio except maybe the original For Two which is way outdated in terms of design and drivetrain. Daimler kept launching new models under the Mercedes umbrella and especially the models that should have gone to the SMART brand to keep Mercedes brand from dilution. It is difficult to understand what was the purpose of SMART otherwise. The A and the B should have been under the SMART brand imo.

Why Bugatti is churning out new variation of Veyron is also quite puzzling if they are loosing such a big amount on each car.
 

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top