I think we all understand the intention of this car, its basically a hard top attempt of the mx5, and a less hardcore lotus elise. For 28,000 pounds the competition is pretty steep though, and people will look at the on paper stats and just wont get it. For the majority of people, they do not track the car, and for a occasional weekend toy, the mx5 must surely be better suited as it is after a convertible.
This car is basically like a gen7 celica but with rwd instead of fwd. Do you think it will be a sales success? I doubt it, not for 28,000 pounds and such a weak engine. 0-60 in 7 secs is a joke.
Not everyone wants a convertible. Many prefer a coupe. Some will need the rear seats; Toyota didn't just throw in rear seats on a whim, it was designed that way from the beginning. For better or worse, there's an image about small convertibles that will turn off a lot of people. For track work, some organizations require a rollbar or cage, which (for some) spoils the lines of a convertible. But look at your Miata example: it's a lot more than the sum of it's on-paper stats. Early test drives of the Toyota/Subaru indicate the same, with the benefit of having rear seats you could use in a pinch (with what looks like more room in back than a TT). Car Magazine's Ben Barry said it
"trounces its closest rival, the Mazda MX-5, in the fun stakes." I dunno, that sounds like something of a pretty good car so far to me. Not so to you?
I have no idea. I've seen some very pessimistic sales goals, which frankly look unrealistically low to me. What figures have
you seen? In this day and age of design & engineering by committee and marketing, the whole ethos of this car is refreshing and should be celebrated.
Dont get me wrong guys, as a track enthusiast I get the intention of the car, and im sure its a blast, but from a sales success point of view I cannot see it selling due to its high price tag. The car is meant to be a all rounder, but so far it looks like it only excels in one department and only when you are in an environment which allows you to do so.
How do you know it's only fun on a smooth, well-paved track? If that video by martinbo is any indication, on a real-world road that car could already be handful when grip is less than optimum, which it often can be. The reality is that many of these cars will probably find a ditch, and it's not due to a lack of power.
The LFA is overpriced for what it is truth be told. Theres nothing groundbreaking as such on the car either. Give me a GT3 RS 4.0 instead.
3 year old audi TTRS
3 year old bmw m3
New scirocco R
5 year old aston v8 vantage
8k more gets you a new boxster
Overpriced...yet's it's practically sold out. There's nothing groundbreaking on a lot of cars in the same price range. That doesn't mean they're not worth it, or that they're not essentially good/great cars. An LP670-4 is ancient as hell, yet it's proof that the visceral, emotive feel of a car (that which many might consider to be a "soul") counts for a helluva lot more than merely technology for its own sake.
Sloppy seconds on most of those cars. Have fun servicing the Aston. By that same logic, why would anyone buy a V8 Vantage when they could have a new Scirocco R? Or put it another way, why would anyone buy a car based on a 1M/yr car like the Scirocco when they can have an exotic, lust-worthy V8 Vantage (with the sort of class and visual drama a Scirocco R owner could only dream of) instead? See? Different strokes for different folks.
And that a front-drive TT might drive better than AWD one isn't necessarily saying a lot. For people in the States, the RenaultSport is a non-starter (as is the Scirocco). While it may be chuckable and fun, it will still feel essentially different from a car that you can drift with the throttle pedal pressed. And it's not like the Scirocco even in R guise has met with universal praise as an enthusiast driver's car.
Without having even driven this car, are you basically saying Toyota
shouldn't be building this kind of car, that they shouldn't try to attract a younger audience back to the brand?