Three things about the interior:
- The steering wheel os influenced by the i8 and VFC. Looks good.
- The new gear level is fugly. Really.
- The plastic buttons remain. Move on, BMW.
So they are using a second screen for passenger instead of the Dual View center screen?And you can see the cloth covering the screen at the passenger side.
![]()
Hi everybody!
The second part on interior quality and craftmanship is what I don't comprehend. Don't get me wrong, many reviewers make similar claims but whenever my collegues and I 'tested' the S-Class (in various trims and up to the S65), most of us were disappointed. The cues say 'Bentley' or 'Rolls' but what you feel is far from that. Vents, keys for A/C, power windows, seats etc., the door pockets .... may all look good but don't deliver on their visual promises. The predecessor was much more conservative but also seemed (to me) more sophisticated in the combination and execution of materials. Now: Do I overlook something when I say 'that's not perfect' or have standards for perfection changed?
I sometimes read about the F01 interior not standing a chance against this new S-Class. Honestly, for a car approaching the end of its cycle, everything's absolutely fine. Its biggest problem might be the resemblance with the 5er interior. Still: if I had the loose cash, I'd rather go for the simple and straight 7er (or A8) than for the overly bling-bling, inconsistent S. In terms of driving, all of them are pretty great, anyway.
So they are using a second screen for passenger instead of the Dual View center screen?
I think we have no issue with the lever's placement, but more its appearance.
Three things about the interior:
- The steering wheel os influenced by the i8 and VFC. Looks good.
- The new gear level is fugly. Really.
- The plastic buttons remain. Move on, BMW.
First of all, I absolutely agree with your observations. Honestly, I don't know hard data on the relationship between such measures and perceived quality but based on my feeling I'd say: yes and no. YES, heavier sometimes may feel more 'solid'. When this is your approach. Preferences or judgments of quality vary a lot. It's not just a matter of taste but a matter of approach. Your approach may be weight ... or touch, smell, sound, association. In clinics, I'm surprised how few participants ask about the finish of the final product, they rarely complain about the fact that they aren't allowed to really touch the models. To me, for instance, the sound of a closing G-class or SEC door is of a much higher 'quality' than in most modern luxury cars. I couldn't judge a car without listening to it or touching it. Getting back to the new S-class: I just do not get over the vents where 'brushed aluminum' after some millimeters fades to raw plastic. Or the inside of the doors! Its antecessor is so beautifully executed, the control for the windows and seats (brushed), the door opener and a door pocket opener (chrome) and the inside material of the door pocket and the door handle .... the current one imo is rescued only by nice Burmester speakers..... However, there are many people who like it and I guess their approach must be a different one. They judge the stylistic elements, the associations (british touch, lounge style, demonstrative - though not very innovative - high-tech) rather than their execution. And that's absolutely legitimate.Do you think weight saving measures have an effect on the perceived quality of things ? Things I'd noticed with the new S-Class were that many things didn't feel as substantial. Door handles, both outside and inside felt 'cheap' to me, but I wasn't sure if it was just because they also felt very light.
Well, I think metal buttons can be used without it being over the top blingy. The first thing that comes to mind is having buttons done in aluminum with either or a brushed or satin finished, akin to those high-end stereos. Or maybe a nickel finish. In a BMW, I, too, would advise against excess chrome.
Indeed, fantastic post @Busty.
Very, very well put.
I personally dislike the MB bling bling with a passion. Looks horrible, without substance and without the real quality to back it all up.
Yes the proportions allow a less upright but more dynamic flowing roofline than before yet still make the requirements in competitive rear headroom expected for a large limousine like the 7er.
But that has always been the 7er's forte in each generation to look more sportier than the rival S -Klasse. Its one tradition carried through each generation including the much-maligned E65 which has a more dynamic rounded roofline.
Free from disguise the actual car has a technical look to symbolise cutting edge engineering and technology.
We have a new pool in the office on seeing who "blinks first" when some information is learned later this year.
I am expecting more articles appearing in the automotive media relating to "Next Generation" models to try and control the narrative even though they will be years away from a car that is just over 12 months to launch.
I hope this is some early interior, because I see plastic buttons.
Besides 7er owners on the E65 did not like the steering wheel mounted gearstick column as they felt it was too Mercedes-like which is why the transmission went back to the centre console.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.