DB10 [Official] The new Aston Martin DB10

[JHF]

http://www.gtspirit.com/2015/02/22/exclusive-aston-martin-db10-photos-from-james-bonds-spectre/

 

[sako97]

****ing ugly and pointless.

?

Its a one-off car made for a movie role, which will provide a relatively small, cash-strapped automotive brand like Aston Martin much needed exposure. Many design cues will be featured on upcoming models.

Looks are subjective but maybe we have a different meaning of the word "pointless"?

 

[Mr Robert]

I like that it looks like a concept.

 

[Betty Swollocks]

I think it looks ugly in these real life photos. Very ugly in fact.

 

[hoffmeister_fan]

when i saw it during the initial presentatio, i thought it looked quite good. But the more I see, the more I realize it lacks a certain sexiness or aggression that you'd see in the DB4 or DBS.

 

[330CIZHP]

Considering how much Aston Martin pays attention to aesthetics and proportions, I am surprised to see such an underwhelming design.

 

[lambornima]

Looks like a re-skinned f-type.

 

[Deleted member 25]

It looks amazing.

 

[Centurion]

I think it looks ugly in these real life photos. Very ugly in fact.

Indeed it does. To me it look like a 10-12 year old concept for the V8 Vantage concept that has not seen the light of day until now.

 

[Kowalski]

?

Its a one-off car made for a movie role, which will provide a relatively small, cash-strapped automotive brand like Aston Martin much needed exposure. Many design cues will be featured on upcoming models.

Looks are subjective but maybe we have a different meaning of the word "pointless"?

If they are cash strapped then they shouldn't waste money making one-off cars and make cars that could make them some much needed money.

 

[JHF]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[JHF]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Heisenberg]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Yaz]

The Jag sounds nasty (in a good way).

 

[Rainer271]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[donkeykong]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Rolf]

This cars styling is not Aston Martin's finest hour, the details look unresolved. Front grill just doesn't look very neat and is not attractive, it seems to be missing a chrome outline that would make it more attractive and the front lights also don't look Aston Martin. The back looks okay but maybe too much of a similarity to the F-type. Its a one off special for a movie but hoping they wont give the green light to bring it to production.

 

[Centurion]

This cars styling is not Aston Martin's finest hour, the details look unresolved. Front grill just doesn't look very neat and is not attractive, it seems to be missing a chrome outline that would make it more attractive and the front lights also don't look Aston Martin. The back looks okay but maybe too much of a similarity to the F-type. Its a one off special for a movie but hoping they wont give the green light to bring it to production.

Given that everyone is salivating over the Jaguar C-X75, I don't think the DB10 has enough buzz to be production worthy.

 

[martinbo]

DB10's copping a lot of flack for what is, ostensibly, a very sleek and elegantly resolved design concept.

 

[hoffmeister_fan]

Considering this is the styling direction AM is heading in with their upcoming with their upcoming DB11, it's not bad. The only thing I am not too fond of is the catfish front.