German Car Forum

^ Eni's the only one I ever heard about this V6 thing. And maybe Scott. Haven't read anythng about a V6 anywhere else. Not in mags and not on the net.....which is weird...

Well, there was an interview with the ///M head who said that they haven't decided which layout to use yet. That's quite a statement. Though, we should just listen to the trustworthy bit of information here and leave the idea of an V6 M3 behind.


Best regards,
south

That what I was going to say, all the V6 claim comes from that interview.

BMW fans have recently learned to always expect the worst.

M officails have said to expect anything but diesel & supercharged powerplants in the M cars: so, with X5M / X6M we got M SUV, turbo, auto gearbox & AWD. So, these solutions are not taboos any more.

What's still missing is V6 & hybrid tech in an M car.

Coming soon ...

V6 is very much on agenda, but will PROBABLY NOT be premiered in the next 3er (and M3) but later in some other BMW model.

But it can happen earlier ... don't be surprised.

Why V6? Better configuration for turbo & hybrid tech: engine is smaller (more compact), turbocharger placement is easier, engine isn't as tall etc. Disadvantages: heavier engine & more vibrations (not as refined running).

So, preliminary simulations show V6 still has advantages over I6 - and the possibly higher development costs (eliminating vibrations, light-weight construction) are easily eradicated with simplier design (lower development costs engine design wise) & cheaper production & module engine design approach (V12 - V8 - V6) - not to mention advantages (if engine weight is reduced!) on car handling due compacter engine & therefore better weight distribution - especially in the case of hybrid or AWD tech on board.

So current advantages I6 turbo over V6 turbo are: lower weight & run refinement. In all the other respects V6 is superior - especially design / engineering / construction wise.

When BMW engineers figures out to lower the weight @ low costs & eliminate vibrations @ acceptable costs - then be ready for V6.

Btw, with hybrid tech turbo-lag is not existent since the electro motor contributes to linear power curve.

This was written in Road and track in 2001. Seems like the idea of a V6 for BMW is not qiute new. Maybe it takes a long time for development

It's kinda ironical, BMW have been selling how I-6 "was" the best configuration (for 6cylinders at least) and some years later V6 is superior. I know technology changes and things change but sometimes just for the sake of keeping a tradition, can't they compromise a little? Afterall running refinement as Eni said is still an advantage of the I6, isn't this perfect refinement of engines part of what defined BMW? I also believe it's not bad for marketing for keeping the I6... it is pretty much general knowledge for someone who followed a bit on cars that I6 and BMW is mated.

I drive two Mercedes with the 320 CDI engine, a 2004 E 320 CDI and a 2008 ML 320 CDI. The first one is an I6 with 204hp and the second one a 224 hp V6. The ML´s engine is by far a better engine, the sound is much better, and it´s less noisier.

What about a F10 M5 with a V6 + KERS?

Tech is changing - and therfore car design (car architecture) ... We are entering turbo & hybrid era. And for this era V-configuration is more appropriate & better solution for 6+ cyl engines.

Turbo & hybrid tech dictate compact engine design - to free some space for turochargers, electromotors, batteries etc.

And V6 design is more compact than I6 design.

Engine bay has a certain volume - and when you have to add additional tech (turbo, hybrid etc) you have to either increase engina bay volume or reduce the size of the existing components (engine, cooling systems, suspension etc).

Not only engines are the victims of such change - also the suspension solutions will be designed in a way to fit new packaging better.

Be sure larger engine bay (and thus larger car) would compromise driving dynamic & BMW image more than V6 in a car with superb driving dynamics & handling.

And BMW is much more about superb driving dynamics than refined engines. So, the priorities are clear - when & what can be compromised a bit & what not.



Sure they could find I6 solution as well - but in that case development & production will be costly, and therefore car price will be higher- making the cars not competitive anymore - or reducing BMW profits sharply ... which would affect future projects. So, not an option at all.