| |
| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Edmunds: BMW 335i, Infiniti G35, Lexus IS 350, Mercedes C350 & Cadillac CTSThis is a discussion on Edmunds: BMW 335i, Infiniti G35, Lexus IS 350, Mercedes C350 & Cadillac CTS within the Internal Combustion forums, part of the Website Forums category; The 320si might have been slow for a homologation special, but with a 0-62 time of 8.1 seconds, it is ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #26 |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 581
Thanks: 943
Thanked 744 Times in 249 Posts
| Re: Edmunds: BMW 335i, Infiniti G35, Lexus IS 350, Mercedes C350 & Cadillac CTS The 320si might have been slow for a homologation special, but with a 0-62 time of 8.1 seconds, it is certainly competitive with other C-Class in the price range (£25,000). Similarly priced C180 Kompressor Sport (£25,832) takes 9.5 seconds, and isn't anywhere near as special. In any case, as stated, the point of the car was purely for homolagation purposes, not to be best in class or anything of that nature. With only ~2600 made, there wouldn't be much fuzz. |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Guibo For This Useful Post: | Sunny (11-06-2007) |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #27 |
| Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Australia
Posts: 64
Thanks: 101
Thanked 78 Times in 39 Posts
| Re: Edmunds: BMW 335i, Infiniti G35, Lexus IS 350, Mercedes C350 & Cadillac CTS Any review is always going to be subjective to some degree or other... So are personal drive impressions of a car... Consequently, putting down one make of car over another, is just plain silly and immature IMHO. Facts can be used to support an opinion/viewpoint, such as 'sportiness' with acceleration times etc, especially if it is an viewpoint such as sportiness that seems to be currently so much in vogue. But what about comfort? What is the objective/factual measure for that? And how about engineering, material, and design quality? What is the factual measure for that? Does longevity and reliability factor into these reviews, or are we only concerned about driving thrills and not the practical realities of actually owning a car? How about the comfort side of it for passengers? Or are we expected to believe that in a relationship where your partner may contribute 50% or more of the cost of the vehicle, that their needs don't matter, as long as the driver gets a 'sporty' drive? So many of these reviews seem only relevant in terms of fulfilling the fantasies of car fanboys and selling magazines as against providing balanced and pertinent information that might suit a car buyer looking to purchase a vehicle, and no doubt with many, and often conflicting needs. Just my impressions/opinion of course... On another note though, it is nice to see no bias between country of origin or brand badge, and that a Japanese car can compete with the acknowledged German standard setter when it comes to that narrow criteria of sportiness in that particular market segment. Best Jon... ![]() |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Me for President ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 21,183
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 7,801 Times in 3,185 Posts
| Re: Edmunds: BMW 335i, Infiniti G35, Lexus IS 350, Mercedes C350 & Cadillac CTS 320si was praised in Europeans carmag. They said the car was like the old E30 to drive (in a good way). 320si might not be superfast but was celebrated for offering a great driving experience.
__________________ BMW M (that’s for Marketing, not Motorsport) “BMW straight six, the sequel: a great concept, masterfully improved. Those people who still want a V6, please stand up” A man is nothing without his car |
| | |