Concerning the old thread regarding Ferrari manipulation I want to came back to the argument again, because some people here has blamed too much singly at that moment. Some people here said that Ferrari used laptop computers for setting the car during their tests with a team to support, the possibility to falsify their own results. I think that the story you created was too long and annoying because it was not concretely based. Not because it can not be true, because everyone's doing well. Here the pics you posted. Honestly concerning the habits of all the other manufacturers, today, without any justification, what I can see is that all they can use the same mode of testing their cars independently of which of them was. Even with team behind the cars. What about these pics of the Nissan team during the NRing testing, use and habits? Those who feel so transparent for you all. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SylW9y5F1zc Honestly, again today, I would like to know which is REALLY the differences between both testing methods for you all. Why was only Ferrari cheating if the 2012 NRing video attempt say that Nissan team had a lot of work to do, get all the data, analyze, tune, calibrate, refine before an other NRing attack. Of course, Ferrari use that method during magazine tests, Nissan during their NRing tests, but what is the justification of one over the other? You all are thinking they are the only two factories with these kind of traditions? So, why raise a fuss about suspecting just by only one? Many have skeletons behind their cabinets. Here too. There is too much obsession with blaming individually, and some members here were well naively affected.