OFFICIAL 2013: Jaguar F-Type

Discussion in 'Jaguar' started by Levi68, Apr 4, 2012.

  1. tristatez28lt1 Well-Known Member

    http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/01/jaguar-confirms-v8-option-for-f-type/

    Car and Driver article:
    http://blog.caranddriver.com/jaguar-confirms-v-8-option-for-upcoming-f-type/

  2. mini_cooper4 Well-Known Member

    And that's a strike!
  3. tristatez28lt1 Well-Known Member

    One more render from Auto Motor und Sport:

    [IMG]
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. tristatez28lt1 Well-Known Member

    http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/283444/jaguar_ftype_r_spied.html


    [IMG]
    [IMG]
    [IMG]
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Centurion Contributing Member

    The shape is shaping up excellently, and the turbine rims will be a feast for the eyes. I look forward to M3 comparisons.
  6. rurella Premium Member

    Why the M3, completely different class of car? Much closer to a Boxster S or 911.
  7. Levi68 Well-Known Member

    Cayman S, 911, being the most expensive, M3 and F-Type R are in some way rivals: all are daily drivable performance cars, the M3 being the most practical. Right now there is alot cross shopping between an M3 and a Cayman S/R. With the F-Type that also is compact quite powerful and light (?) it will give a new choice. I am sure it will be a nice car in terms of looks and performance, just follow the new Jaguar line-up, but quality and reliability could make this car less successful.

    The SLC AMG and P13 will get added to that list, both being placed against the Cayman and 911 at the same time.
  8. rurella Premium Member

    Interesting, I am thinking about the new Cayman S, but wouldn't consider an M3 coupe. I might add the F-Type Jaguar to the list however.
  9. tristatez28lt1 Well-Known Member

  10. tristatez28lt1 Well-Known Member

  11. Merc1 Premium Member

    Paris is going to be a stunning way to start the 2012-2013 auto show season.

    M
  12. Levi68 Well-Known Member

    I'm all for supercharging over turbocharging. That is why I like Audi's move with the supercharged 3.0 V6 TFSI.
  13. Sayyaaf is Just a member

    Martin went over this millions of times, everything is in favor of turbos bar the minimal lag with modern engines, which is proven can be really really unoticable. Superchargers waste many HPs. And that whine isn't sexy at all.

    BTW if I remember correctly, Audi ditched the supercharger quickly in favor of turbos.
  14. Levi68 Well-Known Member

    IMO better than a vacuum cleaner sound of turbocharged engines.
  15. Human BMW's my Brand

  16. Deckhook Well-Known Member

    Driven both and much prefer the supercharger route though I do conceed that it waste HP to achieve the same outputs though with the introductions of clutches the supercharger might regain popularity in the future.

    Also I much prefer a slight whine over a dumping wastegate anyday. ;)
  17. Centurion Contributing Member

    Honda Accord owners will flatter themselves.


    [IMG]
    • Like Like x 1
  18. tristatez28lt1 Well-Known Member

  19. Levi68 Well-Known Member

    We have very different views, but on this one, I agree with you, prefer, still depending on vehicle, supercharging over turbocharging. 335i can't match S4 throttle response and sound, even with aftermarket exhaust. Some modded S4/S5 3.0 TSFI sound nearly better than stock M3.
  20. tristatez28lt1 Well-Known Member

    Autobild render:

    [IMG]
    • Winner Winner x 1

Share This Page